Wednesday, January 25, 2012

EVE University and RvB - Fun Times Always

It's been awhile. Since I've posted anything about EVE University. Since there's been some juicy EVE Uni-RvB drama.

This is what happens when you try to get two incompatible alliances together. One is all for freeform PvP with a very limited set of rules (which are often breached nonetheless.) The other prefers safe gameplay with a heavy overlay of rules and procedures that dictate their play.

The last time we met our heroes, the Uni was up-in-arms when PvP happened. Namely that RvB, in all their PvP enthusiasm, attacked the University POS. No one told RvB that the POS was off-limits. RvB assumed it was just another target of opportunity. The Uni screamed, hollered, stamped its feet and called off the "war."

Many months later, the University has forgiven RvB its transgressions, and they will be going to "war" again, this weekend. This time there will be a list of rules that each corporation has to follow. What not to do. Where not to go.

Before "war" happens, though, hilarity must ensue. Namely the University, once again, getting its panties in a knot when PvP happens.

The University has a large presence in the Hagilur lowsec pocket, out near Hek. Obstensibly for PvP learning purposes. They've been stationed there for a couple months now, so likely a lot of the University's carebear industrialists have moved in also, to reap the extra rewards that they can't quite get from highsec. So, it might explain the hollering that occurred when the following happened.

In a nutshell, a couple of RvB members wandered into the Hagilur pocket and killed a few Unistas. PvP in lowsec. The problem for the University, is that they mind-bogglingly set RvB to +5 status. What that meant is that the folks blowing up the Unistas didn't even appear on the Unista overviews. So, until they examined killmails, they didn't really have a clue who had killed them. The RvBers doing the blowing up had no idea that the Uni had them set to blue.

Why one sets a PvP corporation to blue status is a question for the scholars, especially a PvP corporation that doesn't set any outside corp to +5/+10. Perhaps the University diplomatic corp had some lower-rung RvB diplo agree in principle to mutual blue status. The University went ahead and did it, RvB never did. Mistakes were made, likely not on RvB's part, since they've never had a policy of setting outsiders blue.

Back to the fun. Once what was happening was made clear, hollering started on the Uni chat channel (the one for members and alumni, not the horrible public channel). Here are some of the better comments (names redacted for their own protection):

Unista 01 > why are we giving rvb the privalege of fighting us when they can't follow rules?

Unista 02 > Did we agree to an armistice with them before our war next weekend? Can a diplo confirm?

Unista 03 > Who wants to bet some ISKies taht they'll attack our pos again?
Unista 01 > i'll take that bet & raise you that they'll podkill during our war.
Unista 03 > ROFL!! No doubt!

Unista 04 > We should cancel the big war and teach them a lesson. If they can't obey there standings how are they going to obey any of the rules for the war next week?

Unista 05 > RvB has no honor. We learned that during the last war. Why are we all surprised?


It goes on and on. Apparently the overriding sentiment is that fighting the University is a privilege and that RvB should consider itself lucky.

Then some of the complaining eventually reaches their forums.

It takes an ex-Uni to finally speak some sense to the mounting anger: "To the best of my knowledge, RvB doesn't have any blues, since that would kind of defeat the point. They have like, extra-red, but that's about it. Now come on ... this idiocy is just embarassing the Uni. You're on a public forum section, ffs."

Other than the hilarity of what happened -- that RvB is always getting itself in hot-water with the University when they actually do PvP -- I found some of the director comments eye-opening. This one in particular: "... there are elements of every corporation that have their own methods and agendas. While it reflects poorly on the organization, it is (hopefully) an isloated few who are not adhering to the rules."

That there is the crux of the issue. When you're raised in an environment that is chock full of rules, you come to expect that the outside world should be rules-based as well. When the University says they love PvP, they love PvP within a well-defined framework, one in which the aggressing parties cannot stray. Even Kelduum Revaan has suggested a capture-the-flag system as a replacement to the war declaration system.

When Kelduum is running for CSM7, bear that in mind. When he says he loves PvP, remember two things: a) he doesn't actually participate in PvP, and b) he wants to bring World of Warcraft-style battlegrounds to EVE Online, as a replacement for the war system.

11 comments:

  1. There's no real drama to this. E-UNI and RvB were blue to each other prior to our last arranged event, after which we set them blue again and they did not set us blue. It was a simple mistake.

    Some students got upset about losing ships to blues, which is quite understandable from their perspective?

    ReplyDelete
  2. A diplomatic error. Obviously someone (the incompetent Irdalth?) didn't talk to someone high enough in the RvB foodchain.

    Plus, why would you even need them to be blue before the "war"? What benefit is there to either corp? RvB rarely highsec ganks, and even when they do, what would be the big deal?

    They hit you in lowsec, where PvP is supposed to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is actually quite funny, please keep me updated Unista rage is always great.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think we should be blue as it limits targets, I'm just saying that we were blue (I'm not sure why, it was obviously organised a while ago). That's why blue status was assumed, because we had been blue in the past.

    You're correct that it was a diplomatic error, though I'm not sure at what level. That's all it was though, an error, there's no big drama fallout going on over this and we're all looking forward to the big event. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, teaching lesson. Don't trust anyone is Eve (especially if they are a PvP corp). This is funny though. Having once been a member of E-Uni, this strikes me as a predictable result of trying to control terms of engagement beyond the normal mechanics of Eve.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As the CEO of both Red and Blue I can say that our policy is rarely to set anyone to blue. We have done it recently with The 0rphange, and that was the first time in a long time. We did try and take the POS down as we assumed it was a legitmate target.

    Del

    ReplyDelete
  7. EVE-Uni is such a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Poetic- I didn't know what to make of your opinion of the uni, but now as a blue member in this dec I can say you're spot on. Their "expeditionary force" refuses to engage even with superior numbers. Learning their myriad of bizarre rules makes me wonder how anyone has fun in there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is funny how people use words like 'myriad' to signify the number two. The rules are
    1. no intentional podding (which was violated by RvB, but this did not lead to any bad feelings on uni side), and
    2. each other's home systems are off-limits (which was violated by RvB by accident, and was solved by granting the pilot a green pass to continue his shipping stuff out of Aldrat).
    People who have trouble learning those rules must be quite hard to lead in battle, so kudos to RvB's directors for managing to get them to concentrate enough to actually do PvP! Even if until now, even with superior numbers RvB did only engage fleets I was in after the FC pre-arranged it (and thus they knew they could take the FC out first, giving them another advantage next to their numbers and skill points).

    ReplyDelete
  10. Having been in one of the only corporations to ever kill an EUni tower, I will say this. Towers in EUni have magical powers... they are for some undeclared reason, not strategic military assets when anchored by EUni. In our case, we had a contract to kill euni pilots and about two days in, the contract was increased to encompass the tower kill... which we did with many, many lols. EUni was well humored about the dec (many of us were recent ex-unistas after all) right up until we started shooting the tower. From that point on, you would think that we had raped every uni-pilot's mother on their kitchen table. The actual fact of the matter though was that, a) it was a contract and b) towers are strategic and need to die. In fact, the first time we shot the pos we were only trying to get them to undock... they cried so loud about us being nazi war criminals that our employer said "Kill it."

    EUni is a weird and unrealistic place...

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's happening again ;)

    ReplyDelete