Friday, December 28, 2012

A Work in Progress - The Year Passed to the Year Ahead

This blog has been a work in progress. After a year and a half, I still feel it's finding its voice.

The first six months, 2011, I spent most of it running EVE University through the mud. A lot of sperg and hyperbole, but also I feel a lot of truth about the failures of the organization at the time.

I think I helped open the eyes of a number of EVE University's directors; those that actually play the game (i.e., not Kelduum, who spends all his time just managing the corporate interface, and heading up "meetings".) The directors that mattered, the ones most in touch with their members and the game, they began to realize that the University could be doing a better job of delivering players into the wider game, players who actually recognize the value of EVE Online and conflict, rather than just churning out fearful super-carebears.

EVE University definitely became a better organization in 2012. Most of their really dumb rules were dropped, or turned into guidelines. Kelduum stopped obsessing over ISK ratios on their killboard. Players were allowed to do dumb things, because players learn by making mistakes. The University was not going to create better players by treating all their members as drooling buffoons. Through much time, effort and patience, those directors that matter were able to convince Kelduum that change was needed. Change was needed because they were once again going to become part of the game, whether he liked it or not.

So when Inferno was released, and the old broken wardec system was replaced with a slightly less broken system, EVE University was forced back into the game. And my need to talk about the University, more or less, vanished.

I'm the type of guy who does love to bitch about things, and there was still a lot to bitch about in 2012. Game mechanics. The direction CCP might be taking the game. The seventh CSM.

Aside from the ranting, I had more to talk about personally. My experiences with the game. As EVE University got back into the game, so did I. I stopped trying to do things solo, and sought out groups of people to engage with. Faction warfare eventually became my home. First, with Autocannons Anonymous, and then with Fweddit. I felt I found a real home within the game with the YOLO Coalition (Fweddit, iLaw, Moar Tears.)

Since September, the posts I'm most proud of are the Fweddit-related posts. The mix of personal experience, some mild ranting, and the out-and-out propaganda, it's all been fun and easy to write. Those posts are a fun mix of styles. Some posts, some topics, I struggle with (such as the tutorials), but writing the Fweddit posts are never a chore. I think my joy writing those posts mirrors my experiences with Fweddit.

Certain posts of mine need to disappear entirely. Such as any post about game mechanics that I don't fully understand. When I get some idea stuck in my head about some area of the game that fascinates me (such as technetium or the role of capital ships), I need keep those suggestions to myself. I've been throwing those ideas out into the wind, not really caring if they mirror any sort of reality with the game. I use them mostly as tools for learning more. I know damned well they're going to upset people, and upset people tend to reply. So through that level of antagonism I find I do far more learning about areas of the game I have limited experience with, than I could if I picked the brain of a single player. That's not a particularly healthy way to learn about the game.

So, for 2013, I'm going to resolve to approach nullsec posts differently. Hell, I'm going to approach posts about any area of the game I don't have much experience with much differently. I'm not quite sure yet how to do that, but being more inquisitive than confrontational might help. I'm not going to write "Hey, someone tell me about blahblahblah," because that would be a boring ass post, and I wouldn't expect anyone to spend the time of day answering me. Perhaps more along the lines of "Hey, I was thinking about bloddyblah, and was wondering if this idea I have stuck in my head, would it be viable in any shape or form? How does this particular mechanic currently work?" Rather than just reel off some untested, not well-thought-through idea, instead create a conversation out of it. Anyhow, we'll see how that works out when the time comes.

I'll, of course, still stick with being adamant and opinionated about game mechanics I do understand. I'll still take to task any persons or organizations I feel are being detrimental to the game. I'll still call out those who I think are doing great work. Although, that last one, I don't do nearly enough. It is easier to be negative than it is to be positive. I'll try to point out the positives more often than I have in the past.

2013 should be interesting. And I'll continue striving to make this blog a better forum for the game as a whole.

7 comments :

  1. Quiet interesting Poet.

    Your antagonistic habits do draw readers I am sure but personally, I would find it an exhausting endeavor after a bit. Sometimes I find it exhausting to read. :)

    Hang out with wider social circles. You can and will learn a lot about areas of the game you do not play. People in Eve love showing people how they are wrong about things.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Since September, the posts I'm most proud of are the Fweddit-related posts. The mix of personal experience, some mild ranting, and the out-and-out propaganda, it's all been fun and easy to write."

    So you're just like Susan Black now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Since when does Susan Black do anything but propaganda?

      I do the propaganda, but it's kept separate from everything else. I also talk honestly about faction warfare, pointing out the faults of both sides.

      When has Susan ever written a blog post that wasn't completely self-serving?

      Delete
    2. It's the equivalent of saying "all the other sources are lying and trying to spin it their way! You can trust me!", all the while being no more or less credible than the other sources.

      "Susan's self serving propaganda machine!"
      "Poe's a dirty Amarr sympathizer!"

      And so the cycle continues, each trying to impose its view of FW on each other and the readers, each trying to influence readers into believing what they say as truth. Such as it is when anything involving two antagonistic sides that stand to gain from maximizing its wins/minimizing its losses/imposing "the party line" on all involved.

      Delete
    3. And in my last Fweddit post I dispensed of any outright propaganda when I stated that blueballing happens in both sides when their in system-takeover/plexing mode.

      I do offer fair analysis. And I think the fair analysis is easy to spot from the obvious propaganda.

      When has Susan ever posted anything but a slanted view of faction warfare? Even when Susan posts "numbers" to support her viewpoint, she fails to give any context to the numbers. There was one post of hers, awhile back (during the summer), where she was arguing that the Amarr do as much plexing as the Minmatar (trying to downplay the number of plexing alts on the Minmatar side). Her "numbers" were drawn from the month that Nulli Secunda were in faction warfare (plexing for their glorious return to nullsec), but she failed to mention that fact. Nor did she present numbers for the months preceding or following Nulli's arrival and departure.

      Delete
    4. I vaguely feel like I'm being baited here...and I suppose I'll take a bigger bite later after I've had some sleep and coffee. So, short reply is, you're referring to your Fweddit-Batphones post? The first few paragraphs are chock full of statements that could've started with "Everyone knows xxx is what happens". There's a flaw with that logic.

      Here's another. An event happens. People choose to interpret it in different ways. Your blog is simply one point of view. Neither you or Susan Black are up for any journalistic integrity awards that I'm aware of, so theres no downside to fabricating whatever you want and pass it off as fact ("such and such alliance will failscade if they lose such and such systems"). No. It's opinion, open to bias and perspective. Put in some source material, yank the stats off whatever killboards etc, have your solid facts and then from there it's all subject to interpretation.

      Delete
  3. I have 28 blogs (and rising all the time)open in my browser ATM and you're near the top. I spend nearly as much time reading about the meta-game as playing. Keep it up, however you want to do it !

    ReplyDelete